Cases 31 - 40 of 317
MURPHY v. DAVIS
as 5:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
DARRELL LEON MURPHY, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID J DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Davis
as 1:2022cv02712
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Murphy, Sr.
Defendant:
David J. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northfield Insurance Company v. MMG Management, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02410
Plaintiff:
Northfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
MMG Management, LLC, 2566 Whites Mill Road PCPRE, LLC, Rico Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Murphy v. Ward et al
as 3:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Willie Murphy, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Ward and Warden Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2022cv00128
Plaintiff:
Samuel Earl Murphy
Defendant:
Kevin Sprayberry and Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bartlett v. Douglass et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Richard J. Bartlett
Defendant:
Captian Richard Douglass, Investigator Craig Murphy, Investigator Todd Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sampson v. Black et al
as 6:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brent Sampson
Defendant:
Donna Black, Mike Kile, Norman Royale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Murphy v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Olivia Murphy
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals and Cooper Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00525
Plaintiff:
Jessica A. Murphy
Defendant:
FedEx Freight, Inc. doing business as FedEx Freight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
