Cases 31 - 40 of 88
MADDEN v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2016cv04231
Plaintiff:
KATE MADDEN
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
WALTERS et al v. DELMONT BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2015cv00731
Plaintiff:
KRISTI WALTERS and GEORGE WALTERS
Defendant:
DELMONT BOROUGH POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHARLES MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Mooney et al
as 1:2015cv00627
Petitioner:
Mark A Madden
Respondent:
Vincent F. Mooney and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MADDEN v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00963
Plaintiff:
NICOLE L. MADDEN
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC., MCNEIL CONSUMER HEALTHCARE and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MADDEN v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J. MADDEN
Defendant:
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Religious Accomodation Committe, et al.
as 3:2014cv01776
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Bailey
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E Wezel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Madden v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2013cv02775
Petitioner:
Bobby Madden
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Miscellaneous_party:
District Attorney of Dauphin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clifton et al v. Religious Accommodation Committee et al
as 3:2013cv02680
Plaintiff:
Derek Clifton, Leonards Quattlebaum, Eric Maple and others
Defendant:
Religious Accommodation Committee, John E. Wetzel, Vincent Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
