Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 82
MATTESON et al v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al
as INS/1:15-cv-01493
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA MATTESON , BECKY GRESS , MELANIE JOHNSON and others
Defendant: MIDLAND FUNDING LLC and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
MATTESON et al v. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01493
Plaintiff: JASON BARRIOS, TERESA BAUDOUR, FELICIA BONSER and others
Defendant: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Marcos Ortiz-Cervantes v. Eric Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-3390
Petitioner: MARCOS ORTIZ-CERVANTES
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Marcos Ortiz v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-40061
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCOS ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee: BRAD LIVINGSTON, Director of TDCJ Department of Corrections, WARDEN OF RETRIEVE UNIT, ASSISTANT WARDEN OF RETRIEVE UNIT and others
Marcos Ortiz v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-41144
Petitioner - Appellant: MARCOS ORTIZ
Respondent - Appellee: WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Case name not on file
as 3:2013mc00008
Ortiz v. Stephens
as 3:2013cv00351
Petitioner: Marcos Ortiz
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. Livingston et al The Clerk shall accept no further filings from Ortiz unless accompanied by the full filing fee and the sanction fee.
as 3:2013cv00330
Plaintiff: Marcos Ortiz
Defendant: Brad Livingston, Warden of Retrieve Unit, Assistant Warden of Retrieve Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00191
Petitioner: Marcos Ortiz
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortiz v. Thaler
as 3:2013cv00171
Petitioner: Marcos Ortiz
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?