Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Mathis v. Colvin (CONSENT)
as 1:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
James Eugene Mathis
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lowe v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01634
Plaintiff:
Cedric De'Von Lowe
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Terressa T Pulliam, Jefferson County Sheriff Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Mathis et al
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Juanita Mathis and Christopher L. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
McQueen v. Birmingham, City of et al
as 2:2014cv01201
Plaintiff:
Marcus D McQueen
Defendant:
Birmingham, City of, Birmingham Police Department, B C Miller and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCormick v. Sasser et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00602
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Robert McCormick
Defendant:
Sgt. Sasser, Sgt. Crossley, Lt. Clemons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00390
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vanwagner v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv01561
Plaintiff:
John Edward Vanwagner
Defendant:
Baldwin County Sheriff's Office, Flowers, J Benett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, S. Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mathis et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, et al
as 1:2012cv00386
Plaintiff:
Billy Eugene Mathis, Jr. and Shelly Mathis
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Federal National Mortgage Association aka Fannie Mae
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
