Cases 31 - 40 of 2,182
Barkley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Matthew Barkley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bouchard v. Jones et al
as 4:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Morton S Bouchard
Defendant:
David R Jones, Elizabeth Carol Freeman, Jackson Walker, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Boone v. Matthews
as 4:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Boone
Defendant:
Kelly Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. v. Blackwells Capital LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc. and Braemar Hotels & Resorts Inc
Defendant:
Blackwells Capital LLC, Blackwells Onshore I LLC, Blackwells Holding Co LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Abteen Vaziri, Mary Candace Evans, Matthew Rinaldi and others
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01387
Petitioner:
Matthew Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zimmerman v. Potter County Detention Center
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ivan Zimmerman
Defendant:
Potter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00804
Petitioner:
Matthew Thomas Jones
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Loparo
as 1:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Gonzalez
Defendant:
Matthew Loparo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Savage v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Mikayla Cheyenne Savage
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
