Cases 31 - 40 of 154
MEDINA v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04980
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, TAMMY FERGUSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MEDINA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
ORTIZ v. MEDINA et al
as 2:2019cv04398
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MEDINA, OFFICER SULLIVAN, OFFICER MOONEY and others
Plaintiff:
MISAEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04267
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISON, BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEDINA, BERNARD SCOTT and EVERETT KEITH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04268
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEDINA, BERNARD SCOTT and EVERETT KEITH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDINA v. SAUL
as 5:2019cv04112
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAMON SILVA MEDINA
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MEDINA v. HLADIK, ONORATO & FEDERMAN, LLP
as 5:2018cv00955
Plaintiff:
ANGEL MEDINA
Defendant:
HLADIK, ONORATO & FEDERMAN, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CONCHA v. DUKE et al
as 2:2017cv05321
Plaintiff:
JORGE MEDINA CONCHA
Defendant:
ELAINE C. DUKE, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, RON ROSENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
