Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Beeler v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 3:2015cv00580
Plaintiff:
Barry Allen Beeler
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority, William Johnson, Thomas Robins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Wolfenbarger v. Volkswagen AG et al
as 1:2015cv00326
Defendant:
Volkswagen AG, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc, Audi of America, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D Wolfenbarger
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Adams & Boyle, P.C. et al v. Slatery et al
as 3:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
Adams & Boyle, P.C. , Wesley F. Adams, Jr. and Memphis Center for Reproductive Health
Defendant:
Herbert H. Slatery, III , Michael D. Zanolli, M.D. and John Dreyzehner, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Modrall v. Tennessee Court of the Judiciary et al
as 3:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Robert Gregory Modrall
Defendant:
Tennessee Court of the Judiciary, Don R. Ash, Timothy R. Discenza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Shaw
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Holloway
as 2:2015cv02195
Petitioner:
Michael D. Smith
Respondent:
James M. Holloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Russo v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Russo
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Bedford County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russo v. Bedford County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv02004
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Russo
Defendant:
Bedford County Sheriff's Dept., Austin Swing, Bedford County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunch v. City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee et al (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00400
Plaintiff:
Adam T Bunch
Defendant:
City of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, James T Akagi, Matthew R Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Jones
as 2:2014cv02354
Petitioner:
Michael D. Love
Respondent:
Brenda F. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
