Cases 31 - 40 of 60
VENERI v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv04546
Petitioner:
ANTHONY JOHN VENERI, JR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, GREGORY M. MALLON and G. MICHAEL GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ARROYO v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 5:2013cv02192
Plaintiff:
ADALBERTO ARROYO and MADELINE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
STEVE G. TABBI and MICHAEL GREENE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WASHAM v. PROUD et al
as 2:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
THOMAS S. WASHAM
Defendant:
JUDGE JAMES F. PROUD, JUDGE FRANK HAZEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LOUIS G. STESIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washam v. Proud et al
as 1:2013cv00052
Petitioner:
Thomas S. Washam
Respondent:
James F. Proud, Frank Hazel, Louis G. Stesis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cibula v. Fox et al
as 1:2012cv02065
Plaintiff:
James Cibula
Defendant:
Charles Fox , Lloyd White , Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AGUIAR v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2012cv05266
Plaintiff:
JASON J. AGUIAR
Defendant:
MICHAEL THOMPSON , BRETT WEAVER , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOOD v. WHITE et al
as 2:2012cv03860
Plaintiff:
WALTER M. WOOD, IV
Defendant:
CARROLE WHITE, MICHAEL GREENE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv05112
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PHILADELPHIA EDUCATION COMMISSION, WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUYANNES v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2011cv04478
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. NUYANNES
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, GERARD MCSHEA, JAMES P. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benchoff v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv01106
Plaintiff:
Robert Benchoff
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Andrea Priori-Meintel, Diane Yale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
