Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Albrecht et al v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fowler, Toren Pruden, Charles Withrow and others
Defendant:
Sue Washburn, Paula Myers, Ken Jeske and others
Petitioner:
Miles Erb, Leroy Lamont Wells and Serafin Pahua-Pahua
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Kelley et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Will County and Michael Kelley
Plaintiff:
Shaun Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv10462
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04975
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Michael Kelley
as 20-2729
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Kelley
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv45962
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv21172
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MICHAEL KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69212
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56556
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KELLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Will County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 1:2020cv01250
Defendant:
Michael Kelley, Will County Adult Detention Facility and Dale Santerelli
Plaintiff:
Shane Emery Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
