Cases 31 - 40 of 152
Goldberg v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Carl S. Goldberg
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Buckner
as 4:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Daniel J Fields
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goldberg v. Buckner
as 6:2023cv03014
Petitioner:
Carl S Goldberg
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. Lewis et al
as 6:2023cv03012
Plaintiff:
Eric Crawford
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Michele Buckner and Cheryl Edington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Buckner et al
as 6:2023cv03002
Plaintiff:
James R Thompson
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Katherine Barton, Dr. Ashok Chada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lewis et al
as 6:2022cv03327
Plaintiff:
John R Jones
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Michele Buckner, Missy Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Lewis et al
as 4:2022cv01217
Plaintiff:
John R. Jones
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, Michele Buckner, Missy Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Afiz v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hakeem Afiz and Amiron Taylor
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brand v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00946
Petitioner:
Anthony D. Brand
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Buckner
as 4:2022cv00814
Petitioner:
Leroy Coleman, Jr.
Respondent:
Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
