Cases 31 - 40 of 129
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bates v. Jefferson County Alabama et al
as 2:2014cv01877
Plaintiff:
Whitney Bates
Defendant:
Jefferson County Alabama, Mike Hale , Ron Eddings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGhee v. Hale et al
as 2:2014cv01532
Plaintiff:
Franklin D McGhee
Defendant:
Mike Hale, C Davis, Swanson Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale et al
as 2:2014cv01411
Plaintiff:
Michael D Williams
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Miller, David Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Jefferson County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00228
Plaintiff:
Timothy X. Jackson
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail, Mike Hale and Judge Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. IHS/Jefferson County Jail et al
as 2:2013cv01595
Plaintiff:
Leon Barley, Jr.
Defendant:
IHS/Jefferson County Jail, Mike Hale and Jefferson County Board of Commissioners
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Birmingham Jefferson County Commissioners et al
as 2:2013cv01594
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lavell Williams
Defendant:
Birmingham Jefferson County Commissioners, Carrington, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbison v. Hale
as 2:2013cv01302
Plaintiff:
Martin Bruce Harbison
Defendant:
Mike Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Hale et al
as 2:2013cv00589
Plaintiff:
Reginald Burrell
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Jefferson County, Alabama, Jefferson County Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bozeman v. Hale et al
as 2:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Bozeman
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Rose Williams and Reach
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
