Cases 31 - 40 of 598
Wayne J. Griffin Electric, Inc. v. Griggs Mitchell & Alma of IL, LLC
as 3:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. Griffin Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
GMA-AVM Joint Venture, GMA Construction Group, AVM Contractors, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Clifford Mitchell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Mitchell v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
RosaLee Mitchell
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
MITCHELL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
TOCEE MARTINZE MITCHELL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harco Development, Inc. v. Griggs Mitchell & Alma of IL, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Harco Development, Inc.
Defendant:
Griggs Mitchell & Alma of IL, LLC, AVM Contractors, LLC, GMA-AVM Joint Venture and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Patterson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02034
Petitioner:
Mitchell Clydero Patterson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MITCHELL v. STONE et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
JOHN STONE, MEDICAL STAFF and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. SEIFERT
as 1:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
J.F. SEIFERT, HOLLIE MCCADDAMS, CITY OF ROXBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canady v. Bateholts et al
as 5:2023ct03021
Plaintiff:
Bobby McKinley Canady
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Bateholts and Correctional Officer Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. USA
as 1:2023cv00061
Petitioner:
TOCEE MARTINZE MITCHELL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
