Cases 31 - 40 of 108
MULLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38220
Plaintiff:
ERIN MULLEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26843
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ASHTON MICHAEL MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23195
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22734
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM CHRISTOPHER MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MULLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15383
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARK MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quality Labor Management, LLC v. Mullen et al
as 6:2021cv00589
Defendant:
SCOTT MULLEN and SK MULLEN CONSULTING, LLC
Plaintiff:
QUALITY LABOR MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quality Labor Management, LLC v. Galvan et al
as 6:2021cv00588
Defendant:
JESSICA GALVAN and STEVEN MULLEN
Plaintiff:
QUALITY LABOR MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diehl v. Bailey et al
as 3:2021cv00359
Defendant:
Sean M. Mullen, Jake Bailey and Scott Jensen
Plaintiff:
David Andrew Diehl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SILVA v. SWIFT et al
as 4:2021cv00049
Defendant:
SCOTT KINGSLEY SWIFT, ROBERT HINKLE, DIANNE TURNER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MULLEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv16468
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN MULLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
