Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Dillon v. Highline School District 401 et al
as 2:2009cv01793
Plaintiff:
Nina M Dillon
Defendant:
Highline School District 401, Highline School District 401, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Taranda v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00181
Plaintiff:
Nina L Taranda
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Morris v. Core Innovation NW LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00384
Plaintiff:
Cameron Morris
Defendant:
Core Innovation NW LLC, Core Innovation NW LLC, Sarchela, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Sweet et al v. Hinzman et al
as 2:2008cv00844
Plaintiff:
Bill T Sweet, Bill T Sweet, Bill T Sweet and others
Defendant:
Maryanne Hinzman, Arlene Ventura, Margaret Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
South Bayview Apartments Associates et al v. Continental Western Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv05463
Plaintiff:
South Bayview Apartments Associates and Pan Pacific Properties
Defendant:
Continental Western Insurance Company, Continental Western Insurance Company, Continental Western Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Martin et al v. American Crane & Hoist et al
as 2:2007cv00925
Plaintiff:
Nina L Martin, Nina L Martin, Russell L Martin and others
Defendant:
American Crane & Hoist, Harris Waste Management Group Inc, Harris Waste Management Group Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
South Bayview Apartments Associates et al v. Continental Western Insurance Company et al
as 3:2007cv05287
Plaintiff:
South Bayview Apartments Associates and Pan Pacific Properties
Defendant:
Continental Western Insurance Company, Continental Western Insurance Company, Hall Conway Jackson Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
