Cases 31 - 40 of 65
IOU CENTRAL INC v. DO et al
as 4:2019cv00199
Defendant:
HOANG M. DO, LUXE ENTERPRISES INC, LUX NAILS and others
Plaintiff:
IOU CENTRAL INC and IOU CENTRAL INC doing business as IOU FINANCIAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd v. Palmer et al
as 1:2019cv03655
Defendant:
Supervison of DCS, Four Field Probation Officers, Frank Nattiel and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipsey v. Freeseman et al
as 4:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Commissioner Michael W. Nail, Agent George Moore, Ronald Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Orin Bruce Lipsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03285
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company v. Nailed in Roofing & Restoration, LLC
as 1:2019cv02235
Plaintiff:
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nailed in Roofing & Restoration, LLC and Nailed It Roofing & Restoration, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLaughlin v. Nail et al
as 1:2019cv02124
Petitioner:
Keven McLaughlin
Respondent:
V. Williams and Michael W. Nail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company v. Nailed It Roofing & Restoration, LLC
as 1:2019cv00628
Defendant:
Nailed It Roofing & Restoration, LLC
Plaintiff:
The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NITSCHKE v. KISS NAIL PRODUCTS INC
as 1:2018cv00196
Defendant:
Kiss Nail Products, Inc. and KISS NAIL PRODUCTS INC
Plaintiff:
Dannette Nitschke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiss Nail Products, Inc. v. Revnes Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv04633
Defendant:
Kara Revnes and Revnes Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kiss Nail Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
KING v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2018cv00121
Defendant:
KATRINA HALL, GARY VOWELL, KEVIN HUTTO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SINTEL KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
