Cases 31 - 40 of 70
William Washington, et al v. Global TelLink Corporation, et al
as 17-56300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM NATHANIEL WASHINGTON
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCARNS, GEOFF MILLS and DAVID BABTKIS
Defendant - Appellee:
GLOBAL TELLINK CORPORATION and BRIAN OLIVER, Chief Executive Officer
William Nathaniel Washington v. Jim McDonnell et al
as 2:2017cv05528
Defendant:
County Asst Hopper, County Asst Hopper, Sheriff Jim McDonnell and others
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
William Nathaniel Washington et al v. Keefe Commissary Network et al
as 2:2017cv05311
Plaintiff:
David Babtkis, Michael Mccarns, Geoff Mills and others
Defendant:
Thomas Keefe and Keefe Commissary Network
William Nathaniel Washington et al v. Global Tel Link Corporation
as 2:2017cv05312
Plaintiff:
David Babtkis, Michael Mccarns, Geoff Mills and others
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation and Brian D. Oliver
William Nathaniel Washington v. Marc Diamond
as 2:2017cv00666
Defendant:
Marc Diamond and Marc Diamond
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
Washington v. Lewis
as 2:2016cv03041
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
J. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Nathaniel Washington v. Eric Arnold
as 2:2016cv08312
Respondent:
Eric Arnold
Petitioner:
William Nathaniel Washington
Washington v. Young, et al.
as 2:2016cv01341
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
Young, Weeks, Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. California Department of Corrections
as 2:2015cv02302
Plaintiff:
William Nathaniel Washington
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duru v. State of Georgia
as 1:2015cv02815
Defendant:
Mrs Kerry Kohnen, TSPMG The Southern Permanente Medical Group Georgia, Cobb County Government and others
Plaintiff:
Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
