Cases 31 - 40 of 131
Emery v. Kory et al
as 2:2019cv11419
Defendant:
Allen Kory, City of Lansing, State of Michigan and others
Plaintiff:
Neil Emery
Andersen et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11331
Plaintiff:
Joe Stern, Brent Cook, Judy Brown and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Speerly et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2019cv11044
Plaintiff:
Darrin Degrand, Wesley Won, Joseph Sierchio and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC and Keith Fenske
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
ART VAN FURNITURE, LLC v. ZIMMER et al
as 2:2019cv10880
Plaintiff:
ART VAN FURNITURE, LLC
Defendant:
KINGSWERE FURNITURE LLC, NEIL ZIMMER and ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gallagher
as 2:2019mc50374
Undetermined:
Cortney C. Thomas
Defendant:
W. Neil "Doc& Gallagher
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Baker v. Pries Supply Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Pries Supply Company, Inc. and Tom Vander Ploeg
Plaintiff:
Neil Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pyke v. Pyke
as 1:2018cv01141
Defendant:
Neil R Pyke and Neil R. Pyke
Plaintiff:
Susan E Pyke and Susan E. Pyke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karl v. Cial et al
as 2:2018cv13079
Defendant:
Vijay Cial, Judge Annette J. Berry, Mr. Thomas Hartnett and others
Plaintiff:
Neil R. Karl
Kinney #253729 v. Horton
as 2:2018cv00027
Petitioner:
Patrick Neil Kinney #253729
Respondent:
Connie Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Detroit Coffee Company, LLC v. Soup For You, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv10688
Plaintiff:
Detroit Coffee Company, LLC
Defendant:
Soup For You, LLC and Allen James O'Neil
Counter_claimant:
Allen James O'Neil and Soup For You, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Detroit Coffee Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
