Cases 31 - 40 of 973
Huffman v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08325
Plaintiff:
Kevin P Huffman
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houser v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01394
Plaintiff:
Mark Houser
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, Unknown Stephenson, Timothy Koerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowling v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08462
Plaintiff:
James P Dowling
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quiroz v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08401
Plaintiff:
Rafael P Quiroz
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bickel v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08170
Plaintiff:
Nicholas P Bickel
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phifer v. Boncoskey et al
as 2:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott Phifer
Defendant:
Scott Boncoskey, Todd P Romero, Office of Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Warren
Defendant:
Chris Nanos, Laura Conover, Samantha Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
P&B Franchise LLC et al v. Dawson
as 2:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
P&B Franchise LLC and Melodi Lee Harmon
Defendant:
Andrew R Dawson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Caraffa v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
