Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Schmidt et al
as 4:2014mc00071
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Lawrence P. Schmidt, Futuregen Company, Commercial Equity Partners, LTD. and others
Nichols et al v. MMIC Insurance Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv04025
Plaintiff:
Nicole Nichols and Robert Nichols
Defendant:
MMIC Insurance Inc., Michael P. Woods and Bellevue Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rindahl, Randy v. Pristen, J. et al
as 4:2013cv04078
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
J. Pristen, J. Smith, Unknown Agents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blackcloud v. Dooley et al
as 4:2013cv04001
Plaintiff:
Edward P. Blackcloud
Defendant:
Bob Dooley, Jennifer Stanwick, Susan Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorenson v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv05079
Plaintiff:
James P. Sorenson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Blackcloud v. Kaemingk et al
as 4:2012cv04168
Plaintiff:
Edward P. Blackcloud
Defendant:
Dennis Kaemingk, Doug Weber, Bob Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Orr et al
as 3:2012cv03025
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Adams , Jamie J. Adams , Virginia Adams and others
Defendant:
Daniel Edward Orr and Watkins and Shepard Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers v. Long et al
as 4:2012cv04125
Plaintiff:
Kevin P Myers
Defendant:
Larry Long , Thomas Wollman , Dennis Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2012cv04095
Plaintiff:
Eva P. Hobson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv04090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
