Cases 31 - 40 of 125
GARDNER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00214
Respondent:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BUTLER COUNTY, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS and others
Petitioner:
STEVEN GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allam et al v. PA Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv02131
Plaintiff:
John Anderson, Andrew Allam, Louis Looney and others
Defendant:
PA Dept. of Corrections, PA Attorney General and PA Parole & Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. SANDUSKY et al
as 3:2019cv00183
Defendant:
ANY/ALL JOHN AND JANE DOES, JOHN WETZEL, C.O. GERBER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mustafa Ali v. Joseph H. DuPont, et al
as 19-2750
Defendant / Appellee:
DAWN DUCOTE, Human Resources, Correct Care Solutions, RICHARD ELLERS, VP Correct Care Solutions in PA, DR. HASPER, Psychiatrist, SCI Forest and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUSTAFA ALI
TALLEY v. DOYLE et al
as 2:2019cv01588
Defendant:
CYNTHIA LINK, JOHN WETZEL, R. DOYLE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. GRIESMER et al
as 2:2019cv01587
Defendant:
C/O DALE SCHOENEBERGER, C/O WOODWARD, SGT. ALIMON and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00308
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, DORINA VARNER, GOVENOR TOM WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01685
Defendant:
DR. LUCAS MALISHCHAK, JOHN BURT, JOHN WETZEL and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01687
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, JARED ANKROM, LISA DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. CLARK et al
as 2:2018cv05315
Defendant:
RICHARD DOYLE, UNKNOWN PSYCHIATRIST, R. LADONNE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
