Cases 31 - 40 of 112
MCCLAIN v. WARREN et al
as 2:2011cv07093
Petitioner:
MIKAL MCCLAIN
Respondent:
CHARLES WARREN and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
YOUNG v. TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON et al
as 2:2011cv06855
Plaintiff:
WALTER W. YOUNG, JR.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF IRVINGTON , IRVINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT , HAROLD C. BORK, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MYHAND v. SWEENEY et al
as 2:2011cv06709
Petitioner:
DUANE MYHAND
Respondent:
CINDY SWEENEY and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2011cv06566
Plaintiff:
RUSSEL TINSLEY
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, SPECIAL TREATMENT UNIT, NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONOVER v. MAIN et al
as 3:2011cv06324
Petitioner:
WILLIAM CONOVER
Respondent:
MERIL MAIN and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 3:2011cv05199
Plaintiff:
RANDY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, CHRISTINE D'ELIA, BRUCE KAPLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Lewis v. Kim Guadagno, et al
as 11-3401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK CARLTON LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
KIM GUADAGNO, SECRETARY OF STATE, PAULA DOW, ATTORNEY GENERAL, JOSEPH RIPA, CAMDEN COUNTY CLERK and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM LAYTON and TED COSTA
PRATOLA v. BORNSTEIN et al
as 2:2011cv05000
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. PRATOLA
Defendant:
DANIEL BORNSTEIN, PAULA DOW, ALL JOHN & JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMHA v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2011cv04943
Petitioner:
IBRAHIM SAMHA
Respondent:
PAUL K. LAGANA and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TALIAFERRO v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2011cv04714
Petitioner:
SEAN TALIAFERRO
Respondent:
KAREN BALICKI and PAULA DOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
