Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Hibbeler v. Pearson Education, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00945
Plaintiff:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Defendant:
Pearson Education, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Williams v. Harney et al (PLR1)
as 1:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
Carlos Williams
Defendant:
Pamela C Harney, Larry L Henry, Robert D Philyaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. CCA et al
as 3:2017cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pearson
Defendant:
CCA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Westbrooks
as 3:2016cv03018
Petitioner:
Marcus Pearson
Respondent:
Bruce Westbrooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Metz et al v. Herbert et al
as 3:2016cv02935
Plaintiff:
George Metz , Marilyn Metz , Aubrey Pearson, Jr. and others
Defendant:
William B. Herbert, IV , Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County and The Ridge at Antioch, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearson v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al (TWP2)
as 1:2016cv00318
Plaintiff:
Sharon Pearson
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Graves et al
as 4:2015cv00077
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ricardo McDonald
Defendant:
Steve Graves, Quality Corrections Healthcare, Valeria Uselton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Graves et al
as 3:2015cv01440
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ricardo McDonald
Defendant:
Steve Graves, Quality Corrections Healthcare, Valeria Uselton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunch v. Claiborne County et al (TV3)
as 3:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Melinda Bunch
Defendant:
Claiborne County , David Ray , David Honeycutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Davidson County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Rashunus Pearson
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff Office, CCS Medical Staff and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
