Cases 31 - 40 of 277
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and William Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBride v. Citigroup et al
as 1:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Fodies R. McBride, Sr.
Defendant:
Citigroup, CitiMortgage, Cenlar Heavner and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Perkins v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA
as 1:2022cv07355
Plaintiff:
Candace Perkins
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Perkins v. CommonSpirit Health
as 1:2022cv07313
Plaintiff:
Leeroy Perkins
Defendant:
CommonSpirit Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ramos v. Koltiwenzew et al
as 1:2022cv07301
Plaintiff:
Feliberto Flores Ramos
Defendant:
Chad Koltiwenzew, Todd, Corporal Bartucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayden v. Kordick et al
as 1:2022cv06957
Defendant:
Kariejean Kordick, Karie Kordick, K.J. Kordick and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv03234
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and W Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore-Perkins v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05343
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Elmore-Perkins
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and Sam's West, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Perkins v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04603
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Perkins
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
