Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Harper v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv03516
Plaintiff:
Wilma Harper
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc, Imerys Talc America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward et al v. Schick Manufacturing Inc et al
as 0:2016cv03365
Plaintiff:
David Ward and Teresa Ward
Defendant:
Schick Manufacturing Inc and Edgewell Personal Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Person v. Lewis et al
as 4:2016cv03047
Plaintiff:
Andrea Person
Defendant:
Benjamin Lewis, A Rawski, Nurse Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Sumter County Department of Social Services et al
as 5:2016cv00809
Plaintiff:
Herman C Jones
Defendant:
Sumter County Department of Social Services, Angela Taylor, Rebecca Jones-Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Rawski
as 4:2015cv04606
Petitioner:
Andrea Person
Respondent:
Angelia Rawski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Logan et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 0:2015cv03794
Plaintiff:
Euolinda Rose Logan and James Henry Logan, Sr
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, Wells Fargo & Company, John Stumpf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Person v. Lewis et al
as 4:2015cv02560
Plaintiff:
Andrea Person
Defendant:
Benjamin Lewis, Patricia Yeldell, Angela Rawski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv01709
Plaintiff:
Rose Person
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharon Lott-Person et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv00845
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lott-Person and Mike Person
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cabbagestalk v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Shaheen Cabbagestalk
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections, William R Byars, EH Cooper Trust Fund Head Person of Establishment and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
