Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 31 - 40 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Amara v. Regal Cinemas, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00381
Defendant: Regal Cinemas, Inc.
Plaintiff: Philip Amara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plunkett v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2020cv01184
Plaintiff: Philip Plunkett
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Cherry et al v. Cherry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02532
Plaintiff: W. Neal Cherry, Darrell K. Cherry and Philip A. Cherry
Defendant: G. Douglas Cherry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hershey v. Oldham et al
as 2:2020cv00012
Defendant: Tom Jones, Sgt. Jeffrey Bulakowski, Dr. Philip Oldham and others
Plaintiff: Richard Hershey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00005
Defendant: NJOY, LLC, f/k/a NJOY Vapor Products, LLC, John Does 1-100 Inclusive, JUUL Labs, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Dathan Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00955
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Stryker et al (TV1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00398
Plaintiff: Robert D Jones
Defendant: Brandon Glover, John Holmes, Philip M Jinks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emidy v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02671
Defendant: JUUL Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and Altria Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: John Scott Emidy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pendergrass v. Parker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00072
Defendant: Tony Parker, Sean Brantley, Eric Bryant and others
Plaintiff: Mario Pendergrass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?