Cases 31 - 40 of 542
Carson v. Bonner et al
as 3:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
Michael R. Bonner, Travis Vance, Richard Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis v. Reeves et al
as 3:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
Terry Curtis
Defendant:
Govornor Tate Reeves, Commisioner Burl Cain, Dr John Doe Brazier and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Thompson v. Boulet
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Thompson
Defendant:
Paul Boulet
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Foster et al v. Leatherwood
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Foster and Mary E. Foster
Defendant:
Almous Leatherwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips, Jr. v. State of Mississippi
as 4:2022cv00008
Petitioner:
Roosevelt Phillips, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins v. McGuire et al
as 3:2021cv00810
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Welch Adkins
Defendant:
Phillip McGuire, Beverly Jones-Hunter, Patrick Hopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
McGilBerry v. Morris et al
as 4:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Phillip Charles McGilBerry
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Johnnie Denmark and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Graise v. Procollect, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00705
Plaintiff:
Phillip Graise
Defendant:
Procollect, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
