Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 728
Pritchett v. Dinello et al
as NYS/1:23-CV-05664
Plaintiff: Pritchett
Defendant: Dinello
Pritchett v. Dinello et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv05664
Plaintiff: Sean Pritchett
Defendant: David Dinello, Susan Mueller and Chung Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRITCHETT v. GOURLEY et al
as 2:2023cv02490
Petitioner: ZACKARY PRITCHETT
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT MR. GOURLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02837
Defendant: Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff: Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Carlos R. Pritchett v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv02799
Defendant: 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff: Carlos R. Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
O'Neill v. IVERIC Bio Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00652
Plaintiff: Shannon O'Neill
Defendant: Adrienne L. Graves, Mark S. Blumenkranz, Pravin U. Dugel and others
Coffman v. IVERIC bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00648
Plaintiff: Catherine Coffman
Defendant: IVERIC bio, Inc., Adrienne L. Graves, Mark S. Blumenkranz and others
USA v. Taikwan Pritchett
as 23-2005
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: TAIKWAN PRITCHETT
Michael Pritchett v. USA
as 1:2023cv00598
Petitioner: Michael Pritchett
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
O'Dell v. Iveric Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04447
Plaintiff: Ryan O'Dell
Defendant: Iveric Bio, Inc., Mark S. Blumenkranz, M.D., Axel Bolte and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?