Cases 31 - 40 of 401
Palmer v. Rutherford
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Steven Palmer
Defendant:
Scott Rutherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Silva v. Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Barbara Silva
Defendant:
Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Palmer v. Bowers et al
as 4:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Palmer
Defendant:
Rodger Bowers, Justin C. Sands, Johnny W. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arredondo v. Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Mabel Arredondo
Defendant:
Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Palmer v. Wynne Unit Medical Staff
as 4:2022cv03898
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Palmer
Defendant:
Wynne Unit Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collazo et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company et al
as 5:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jorge Collazo and Wendy Sosa
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company and Russell Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas El v. State Of Texas et al
as 4:2022cv03191
Plaintiff:
Phinehas Woodley Thomas El
Defendant:
State Of Texas, Coventry Homes LLC, DFH Coventry LLC and others
Claimant:
Jerry Wayne Thomas Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
