Cases 31 - 40 of 212
JOSEPH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21531
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JOSEPH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Groulx v. People's Republic of China et al
as 1:2022cv12295
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Defendant:
People's Republic of China, Bytedance, Toutiao and others
Groulx v. Zawadski
as 1:2022cv12294
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Defendant:
Mark Zawadski d/b/a Saginaw Spaulding BTS Retail d/b/a Dollar General and Mark Zawadski d/b/a Saginaw Spaulding BTS Retail d/b/a Dollar General Doing business as Saginaw Spaulding BTS Retail Doing business as Dollar General
Groulx v. Saginaw County Road Commission
as 1:2022cv12049
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Defendant:
Saginaw County Road Commission
Groulx v. Dollar General Corporation, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv12050
Plaintiff:
Patrick-Joseph Groulx
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation, Inc. and Mark Zawadski
Energetic Tank, Inc. v. Unknown Defendant
as 22-1765
Appellant:
Energetic Tank, Inc., as Owner of the M/V Alnic MC, for exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Counter Claimant:
Navin Ramdhun
Claimant:
Brandon Tolley
Appellee:
Haruka Ramdhun, Jason Luangco, Cheysserr Luangco and others
DEVANEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19662
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JOSEPH DEVANEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOSEPH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14714
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JOSEPH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PERRONG v. AMERICAN WATER CONCEPTS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00931
Plaintiff:
ANDREW R. PERRONG
Defendant:
PATRICK JOSEPH ELLIS, V, DOES 1 THROUGH 100, HOME VALUE PROMOTIONS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
KIMENER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14928
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JOSEPH KIMENER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
