Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Netsphere Inc. et al v. Baron et al
as 1:2010mc00250
Plaintiff:
Netsphere Inc., Manila Industries Inc. and Munish Krishan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Baron and Ondova Limited Company
Receiver:
Peter S. Vogel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Netsphere, Inc. et al v. Ondova Limited Company et al
as 4:2010mc00501
Defendant:
Ondova Limited Company and Jeffrey Baron
Plaintiff:
Netsphere, Inc. , Manila Indus., Inc. and Manush Krishnan
Receiver:
Receiver Peter Vogel and Peter S. Vogel
Netsphere et al v. Baron et al
as 5:2010mc00032
Plaintiff:
Netsphere, Inc. , Manila Indus, Inc and Munish Krishnan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Baron and Ondova Limited Company
Receiver:
Peter S Vogel
Netsphere Inc., et al v. Jeffrey Baron
as 10-11202
Movant - Appellee:
PETER S VOGEL
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NETSPHERE INC., MANILA INDUSTRIES INC. and MINISH KRISHAN
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY BARON
Netsphere Inc et al v. Baron et al
as 2:2010mc03351
Plaintiff:
Netsphere Inc, Manila Industries Inc and Manush Krishnan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Baron and Ondova Limited Company
Receiver:
Peter S Vogel
Netsphere et al v. Baron et al
as 2:2010mc01189
Plaintiff:
Netsphere, Manila Industries and Munish Krishan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Baron and Ondova Limited
Receiver:
Peter S. Vogel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Netsphere, Inc. et al v. Baron et al
as 4:2010mc00117
Plaintiff:
Netsphere, Inc., Manila Indus., Inc. and Manush Krishnan
Defendant:
Jeffrey Baron and Ondova Limited Company
Receiver:
Peter S. Vogel
Krishnan et al v. Baron et al
as 3:2010mc00010
Plaintiff:
Manush Krishnan, Netsphere, Inc. and Manila Indus., Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Baron and Ondova Limited Company
Receiver:
Peter Vogel Receiver and Peter S Vogel
Netsphere et al v. Baron et al
as 2:2010mc00072
Defendant:
Jeffrey Baron and Ondova Limited Company
Plaintiff:
Netsphere, Inc., Manila Indus., Inc. and Manush Krishman
Receiver:
Peter S. Vogel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
