Cases 31 - 40 of 100
Pittman v. Corbett et al
as 3:2014cv00567
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Pittman
Defendant:
Tom Corbett, John Wetzel and Jerome Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2014cv00231
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT, JON WETZEL and J. WALSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.D. et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06162
Plaintiff:
A.D. , KAYLA MCDOWELL , E.G. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. , PFIZER INTERNATIONAL, LLC , J.B. ROERIG & CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
THOMPSON v. TODD et al
as 2:2013cv01462
Petitioner:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Respondent:
RANDAL B. TODD, ADMINISTRATOR, PRESIDENT JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AUD et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05865
Plaintiff:
JANICE AUD , RENETTA BARNES , SAMUEL BIGBOY, II and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARKS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv05642
Plaintiff:
CONRAD CLARKS and DAVID PITTMAN
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, ALL AMERICAN SPORTS CORPORATION, RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PITTMAN v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2013cv05632
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
JAMES B. MARTIN, ESQ., DOUGLAS REICHLEY, ESQ. and STEVEN LUKSA, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. TOOD et al
as 2:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
LYNNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
RANDAL B. TOOD, COURT ADMINISTRATOR, PRESIDENT JUDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv01473
Petitioner:
Darnell Pittman
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PITTMAN v. WALSH et al
as 5:2013cv00348
Petitioner:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Respondent:
JEROME WALSH, OFFICE OF DIST. ATT., LEHIGH COUNTY and OFFICE OF PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
