Cases 31 - 40 of 67
William Poe v. Health Net, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv09792
Plaintiff:
William Poe
Defendant:
Health Net Community Solutions, Inc., Health Net of California, Inc., Centene Management Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dane et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 3:2019cv00339
Plaintiff:
Deborah Boyd, Donna Stoker, Jennifer West and others
Defendant:
DOES 1- 100, Boston Scientific Corp. and Boston Scientific Corp. doing business as Mansfield Scientific, Inc. doing business as Microvasive Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Poe v. Ndoh
as 3:2018cv02850
Petitioner:
Sidney R. Poe, Jr.
Respondent:
Rosemary Ndoh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02767
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Serene Cottini-Guillot v. Baldwin Park Unified School District et al
as 2:2016cv07025
Defendant:
Baldwin Park Unified School District, Does, Carl Miedema and others
Plaintiff:
Serene Cottini Guillot
Dean Poe et al v. County of Ventura California et al
as 2:2016cv06083
Defendant:
Jeff Barry, Jeff Barry, Chris Borkovec and others
Plaintiff:
Noah Martinez, Dana Poe, Dean Poe and others
Mikkin et al v. Beverly Hills Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
Donna Mikkin and Edward Mikkin
Defendant:
Beverly Hills Group, Inc., Jeffrey Thomas, Danielle Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05490
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sandefur v. Mirkarimi et al
as 5:2014cv03899
Plaintiff:
Jason I Sandefur
Defendant:
Ross Mirkarimi, Joe Goldenson, San Francisco Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
