Cases 31 - 40 of 154
Hachmeister v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2020cv01479
Defendant:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board, Illinois Department of Corrections, Unknown Illinois Prisoner Review Board Employees and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hachmeister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. Fink et al
as 3:2020cv03046
Plaintiff:
Donald E Beard, Jr
Defendant:
Joshua Fink, Parole Agent's Office, Prisoner Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03053
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nepras v. Illinois Prisoner Review Board
as 1:2019cv07777
Defendant:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Nepras
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevarez v. Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2019cv04496
Plaintiff:
Valente Nevarez
Defendant:
S Janer, Commander Robinson, Lambert M Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritte v. Vescogni et al
as 1:2019cv03090
Defendant:
Kye Denault, Howard Chris Ryan, Jr., LaSalle County Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin L. Merritte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albert Johnson v. Glen Austin, et al
as 19-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT L. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PRISONER REVIEW BOARD SUPERVISOR, JUDY OAKLEY, Parole Agent, MARK SCHAFER, Champaign County Parole Supervisor and others
Hernandez v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv00028
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Craig Findley, Illinois Prisoner Review Board and others
Plaintiff:
David Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fett v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv03306
Defendant:
Illinois Prisoner Review Board, John R Baldwin, Illinois Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Fett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Ware et al
as 1:2018cv06354
Defendant:
Austin W Ware, Antonio Baskerville, Prison Review Board and others
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
