Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Landis v. UNUM Group Corporation et al
as 7:2017cv01690
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, UNUM Group Corporation and UNUM Provident Corporation
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Landis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Morgan v. Provident Life And Accident Insurance Company et al
as 2:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
James O Morgan, III
Defendant:
Provident Life And Accident Insurance Company and Unum Group Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Disability Act of 1990
Dixie Emergency Physcian LLC et al v. Team Health Inc et al
as 7:2016cv01622
Plaintiff:
Dixie Emergency Physcian LLC , Carpen PC , EMP Inc and others
Defendant:
Team Health Inc and Paragon Contracting Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Otero v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co
as 7:2016cv01555
Plaintiff:
Arturo J Otero
Defendant:
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Corizon Medical Provider Inc et al
as 4:2016cv01470
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Smith
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Provider Inc and Brookwood Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baird v. Tech Providers, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01467
Plaintiff:
Diana M Baird
Defendant:
Tech Providers, Inc and Claude H Estes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Holmes v. UNUM Group et al
as 2:2016cv00636
Plaintiff:
Robert A Holmes, II
Defendant:
UNUM Group and Provident Life And Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foster v. Meeks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
Shelton Foster
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks and Southern Health Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
