Cases 31 - 40 of 140
WAITING FOR WALK-IN PAYMENT & WILL FILE CCS (PC) Stewart v. Fu et al
as 2:2019at00125
Defendant:
Sacramento Sheriff Department, Dr. Fu, Sacramento Office of County Counsel and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Andrew Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wilson v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Earl Helfrich, G. Davis, Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fasion et al v. Jones
as 2:2019cv00182
Defendant:
Scott R. Jones
Plaintiff:
Sonia Lewis and Tanya Fasion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul Parshall v. Community Bank et al
as 2:2018cv04821
Defendant:
Community Bank, Charles E. Cook, Matthew Denmark and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Abbott v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2018cv00633
Plaintiff:
Seth N. Abbott
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Scott R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriff's Office, Sacramento County, McMahon and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodrique v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2017cv02698
Plaintiff:
Mayco M. Rodrique
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Scott R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2017cv02346
Plaintiff:
Clifton D Harris
Defendant:
County of Sacramento , Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Scott R Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nak Kim Chhoeun et al v. David Marin et al
as 8:2017cv01898
Petitioner:
Nak Kim Chhoeun and Mony Neth
Respondent:
Elaine C. Duke, Thomas D. Homan, Sandra Hutchens and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05729
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
