Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Valencia v. Rushing
as 4:2010cv02087
Plaintiff:
Carlos Gabriel Perez Valencia
Defendant:
R. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medrano-Arzate v. Rushing
as 4:2010cv01133
Petitioner:
Mariano Medrano-Arzate
Respondent:
R. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivas Sena v. Lapping
as 4:2010cv01140
Petitioner:
Hilden Rivas Sena
Respondent:
Harvey Lapping and R. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Lapping
as 4:2010cv01144
Petitioner:
Adneer Gonzalez
Respondent:
Harvey Lapping and R. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Waldner v. North American Truck & Trailer, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv04056
Defendant:
North American Truck & Trailer, Inc., Sioux Falls Kenworth, Inc., Mid-States Acceptance Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Waldner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Acosta v. Corrections Corporation Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00885
Plaintiff:
Miquea Isidro Acosta
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation Of America, Aiad Toss, Dana Orenic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. State of Ohio et al
as 4:2010cv00293
Petitioner:
Charles N. Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Ohio Attorney General, U.S. Marshals Service, Northern District of Ohio, R. Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RUSHING v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33907
Plaintiff:
ROY R. RUSHING
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Medrano-Arzate v. Rushing
as 4:2009cv02513
Petitioner:
Mariano Medrano-Arzate
Respondent:
R. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valencia v. United States of America, et al.
as 4:2009cv02137
Petitioner:
Carlos Perez Valencia
Respondent:
United States of America and R. Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
