Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Textile Rubber & Chemical Company Employee Health Benefit Plan v. Parkridge Medical Center et al
as 4:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Textile Rubber & Chemical Company Employee Health Benefit Plan
Defendant:
Parkridge Medical Center, David Redd, Vanderbilt University and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hill et al v. Macon Police Department et al
as 5:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
Tony Hill, Sr. and Tony Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Macon Police Department , City of Macon , Officer Antoinne Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaylor et al v. McCallum et al
as 2:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Timothy Kaylor and Rusty Kaylor
Defendant:
Wayne L. McCallum, Rebecca M. McCallum, Carolyn Turley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moss v. Gorham et al
as 5:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Henry Marvin Moss
Defendant:
Sgt Gorham, Sgt. Jones, Mr Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redd v. Hilliard
as 5:2009cv00354
Plaintiff:
Brian Redd
Defendant:
Ray Hilliard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00032
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. Donald et al
as 1:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Hall
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Whitney Thompson, Victor Walker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Peterson v. Perdue et al
as 1:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
James Peterson
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, James Donald, Wendi Thompson Squire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
