Cases 31 - 40 of 112
Jordan v. Reeves et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Michael Jordan
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, Warden J. Vigilante, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Pendleton et al
as 5:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Shunlekee Pendleton, Gabriel Walker, Tate Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reeves et al v. AV Nail Spa Ridgeland, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Hung Thanh Nguyen, Scott Reeves and Tim Nguyen
Defendant:
Lan Khue Thi Huynh, AV Nail Spa Ridgeland, Inc., Michael Lam and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McDowell v. Reeves
as 3:2021cv00722
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice McDowell
Defendant:
Carlton W. Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Cruse Jr. v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andrew c. Cruse Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, Vitalcore Health Strategies, M.D.O.C. Cheif Medical Director Dennis Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Young v. Reeves et al
as 3:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Rosa Belara Young
Defendant:
Honorable Tate Reeves and Jackie Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00166
Petitioner:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Respondent:
State of Mississippi, Tate Reeves and Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Tawana Terrell Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Governor Tate Reeves, State of Mississippi and Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
