Cases 31 - 40 of 65
JOHNSON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE L JOHNSON, JR and FRANKIE LEE JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., MARTZ and REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARR III v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01420
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WELDON CARR III
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AVILA, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARELLANO v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv01340
Petitioner:
ANTONIO ARELLANO
Respondent:
REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALATORRE v. REGAL et al
as 1:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
SPIROS ALATORRE
Defendant:
DENIS REGAL, JIM BALDMAN, MICHAEL PFLEAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMANO v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
DEREK ROMANO
Defendant:
DENNIS REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. SIMONE et al
as 1:2022cv01082
Plaintiff:
GREGORY W. BROWN
Defendant:
SIMONE, FISH, ARTHUR NYEAYEA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Frankie L Johnson, Jr and Frankie Lee Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Robert Carter, Jr, Martz and Regal
Not Classified By Court:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CREWS v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv00586
Petitioner:
VICTOR CREWS
Respondent:
DENNIS REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COLEMAN v. REGAL
as 1:2022cv00378
Petitioner:
BRADLEY ROBERT COLEMAN
Respondent:
D. REGAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROMANO et al
as 1:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
DEREK ROMANO
Defendant:
DENNIS REGAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
