Cases 31 - 40 of 1,813
McNeemer v. Tibbs et al
as 2:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard McNeemer
Defendant:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs and Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Keith Richard Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kavazanjian v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Kavazanjian
Defendant:
John Doe, Jim Doe, Jay Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abner v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Abner
Defendant:
The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Acord, Clark Blackburn, Shane Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
C.T. et al v. K.A.S. Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
C.T. and Richard B. Timmis
Defendant:
K.A.S. Trucking, LLC and Douglas Schmincke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
Richard William Jones
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Timmis v. K.A.S. Trucking, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Timmis
Defendant:
K.A.S. Trucking, LLC and Douglas Schmincke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Haggarty v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Richard Haggarty
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gallegos v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00097
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Gallegos
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Account Receivable
Glenn v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00121
Petitioner:
Richard Glenn, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
