Cases 31 - 40 of 1,679
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Vashon Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alexander v. Aleman et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Roger Heard Alexander
Defendant:
Jose R Aleman, Consuelo Benavides-Martinez and Nicholas R Pecot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rangel v. HMD Express IL Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Roger Rangel
Defendant:
HMD Express IL Inc, Ahmed W Hamarshah, HMD Express IL Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Alexander v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04411
Petitioner:
Roger Alexander
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walls v. Harris County et al
as 4:2023cv04826
Plaintiff:
Roger Walls
Defendant:
Harris County and Officer J. Carrigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEPS SERVICES, LLC v. BLUE ESCAPE POOLS LLC, ET AL.
as 4:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
BEPS SERVICES, LLC doing business as BLUE ESCAPES POOL & SPA
Defendant:
BLUE ESCAPE POOLS LLC and ROGER DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hafner v. DeLaura et al
as 6:2023cv00507
Plaintiff:
Robert Duane Hafner
Defendant:
Unknown DeLaura, Unknown Garcia, Unknown Murdock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rogers
as 1:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Cathy Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Sharli Powell Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
