Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Rollins v. Dart
as 1:2014cv10042
Plaintiff:
Dayquan Rollins
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Rollins v. Murphy et al
as 1:2014cv06153
Plaintiff:
Rodney Rollins
Defendant:
Allen Murphy, Willie Hess and Cook County Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Rollins
as 1:2014cv04798
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marshall D Rollins
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Rollins
as 1:2014cv04751
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Daryl Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund et al v. Craig Rollins d/b/a Dyna-Craft Contracting, Inc.
as 1:2014cv04333
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Pension Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund , Chicago Regional Council of Carpenters Supplemental Retirement Fund and others
Defendant:
Craig Rollins d/b/a Dyna-Craft Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rollins v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv50248
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Rollins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rollins v. Willett et al
as 1:2013cv07211
Plaintiff:
Rodney Rollins
Defendant:
Joseph Willett, Kerry Durkin, Curtis Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
