Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
CARTER v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
as 2:2011cv01621
Plaintiff:
SANDRENA REBECCA CARTER
Defendant:
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DICARO v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
as 2:2009cv04536
Plaintiff:
JOHN DICARO
Defendant:
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. TOWNSHIP OF BETHLEHEM
as 5:2009cv03923
Plaintiff:
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF BETHLEHEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
JOHNSON v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03664
Plaintiff:
ANGIE S. JOHNSON
Defendant:
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. and ROBERT FISHMAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FREEMAN v. RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03302
Plaintiff:
DONALD FREEMAN
Defendant:
RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC., RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, INC., ABBOTTSFORD FAMILY PRACTICE AND CONSULTING and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv03310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
