Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Rich Products Manufacturing Corporation
as 2:2011cv02168
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Rich Products Manufacturing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Rich et al v. Reichardt et al
as 2:2011cv01935
Plaintiff:
Michael Christian Rich, Terrance Jon Irby, Jeffrey Dean Peters and others
Defendant:
Will Reichardt, Charles Wend, Juanita O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Motricity, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01678
Defendant:
Motricity, Inc. , Ryan K. Wuerch, Allyn P. Hebner and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Couch , Wayne Browning and Nada Haralovich
Movant:
The Lyons Family , Cliff Mosco and Rich Hardy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
CH2O Inc v. Bernier et al
as 3:2011cv05153
Plaintiff:
CH2O Inc
Defendant:
Rich Bernier and Jay Sughroue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Florer v. Schrum et al
as 3:2011cv05135
Plaintiff:
Dennis Florer
Defendant:
Devon Schrum , Brandy Jones , Carla Schettler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Jefferson County et al
as 3:2011cv05026
Defendant:
Jefferson County , Juelanne Dalzell , John Doe Dalzell and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan C. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mahone v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2010cv05847
Plaintiff:
Sylvester James Mahone
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Sheriff's Dept, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarrer et al v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2010cv05670
Plaintiff:
Larry Tarrer and Raymond Garland
Defendant:
Pierce County, Pierce County Sheriff's Department, Martha Karr and others
Florer v. Schrum et al
as 2:2010cv05084
Plaintiff:
Dennis Florer
Defendant:
Devon Schrum, Jeff Uttecht, John Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burch et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2010cv00807
Defendant:
State of Washington, Steve Hammond, Ken Quinn and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
