Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Kearney v. N.Y.S. DOCS et al
as 6:2010cv06202
Plaintiff:
Richard Kearney
Defendant:
N.Y.S. DOCS, John Doe, Joseph F. Haluska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00910
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Holland
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. C.M.S. et al
as 1:2009cv00776
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Holland
Defendant:
C.M.S., Tracy Wilkens, Stephen Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens-Ali v. Pennell et al
as 1:2009cv00556
Plaintiff:
Ushango Owens-Ali
Defendant:
Frank C. Pennell, Ron Hosterman, Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Hartman v. Corr Med Ser, et al
as 09-2727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. HARTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORR MED SER, JILL MOSSER, HEATHER and others
Edwards v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00370
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Edwards
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl C. Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goddard v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2008cv00569
Plaintiff:
Regent Goddard
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Stan Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roland Williams v. Michael DeLoy
as 08-2488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLAND WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RICHARD KEARNEY, ATTY GEN DE and MICHAEL DELOY
Roten v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Ben Roten
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Mike Deby, Jill Mosser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
William E. Hartman
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Jill Mosser, Medication Reordering Nurse #1 Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
