Cases 31 - 40 of 198
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: Fraternal Order of Police, Miami Lodge 20, Ins., et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 22-80116
Not Classified By Court:
In re: HIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, MIAMI LODGE 20, INSURANCE TRUST FUND, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 1 HEALTH FUND, PETER STALEY and others
Petitioner:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., GILEAD HOLDINGS, LLC, GILEAD SCIENCES, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Susanville Elementary School District et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45031
Plaintiff:
Susanville Elementary School District and Lassen County Office of Education
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Doe et al v. Endo Health Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00771
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Baby Doe, Brother Doe, Baby Roe and others
Guardian Ad Litem:
Jennifer Sheppard
Intervenor:
Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Marion County Board of Education et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45028
Plaintiff:
Marion County Board of Education, Wyoming County Board of Education, Kanawha County Board of Education and others
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Endo Health Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hancock County Board of Education et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45027
Plaintiff:
Hancock County Board of Education and Hamblen County Board of Education
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., TEVA Pharmaceuticals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Southwestern Central School District v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45024
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Central School District
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Board of Education of Boardman Local Schools et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2022op45023
Plaintiff:
Board of Education of Boardman Local Schools and Board of Education of Liberty Local Schools
Defendant:
Cephalon, Inc., Teva Phamaceutical Industries Ltd, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baldwin v. Rite Aid Hdqtrs,
as 1:2022cv00679
Defendant:
Travis Baldwin, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. a foreign corporation doing business as Rite Aid Store #05386 and Rite Aid 915 Northeast D St.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
