Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Van Horn vs. Hornbeak, et al.
as 1:2008cv01622
Plaintiff:
Dondi Van Horn
Defendant:
Tina Hornbeak, James E. Tilton, Robin Dezember and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Poon v. Kelso et al
as 2:2008cv02248
Plaintiff:
Albert Poon
Defendant:
Clark J. Kelso, Robert Sillen, G. Cheung and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Poon v. Kelso et al
as 3:2008cv04343
Plaintiff:
Albert K. Poon
Defendant:
John Clark Kelso, Robert Sillen, G. Cheung and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goldstein v. Sillen
as 4:2007cv05958
Petitioner:
Darryl Lee Goldstein
Respondent:
Robert Sillen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medical Development Internatio v. California Department of Corre, et al
as 08-15759
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ROBERT SILLEN, individually and as Receiver and J. CLARK KELSO, Receiver
Bergne v. US District Court, et al
as 08-15346
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETER MICHAEL BERGNE
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and ROBERT SILLEN
Uhlman v. Suryadevara et al
as 1:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jacquelyn Uhlman
Defendant:
Suryadevara, Iyer, Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv00810
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ray Warren
Defendant:
James Tilton, Robert Sillen, Kannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Sillen
as 2:2008cv00130
Respondent:
Robert Sillen and Governing Body of the California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Division of Correctional Health Care Services
Petitioner:
Roger Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carter v. Sillen et al
as 2:2008cv00125
Petitioner:
Joshua Casey Carter (aka Eric A. Werve Jr.)
Respondent:
Robert Sillen and K. Prosper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
