Cases 31 - 40 of 280
DESENBERG v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv01534
Plaintiff:
ROGER MARX DESENBERG
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
ROGERS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv00787
Plaintiff:
YAMISE ROGERS and YAMISE K. ROGERS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 22 U.S.C. § 4140 Foreign Service Grievance Act
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. PRO-FOOTBALL, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03813
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
PRO-FOOTBALL, INC., DANIEL SNYDER, NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
ISOM v. PAXTON et al
as 1:2022cv03558
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
KEN PAXTON, SCOTT LEKAM, AVRIL HAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02942
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LASSITER v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2022cv02567
Plaintiff:
DUSKIN CORBAN LASSITER
Defendant:
TODD YOUNG, JOHN BARRASSO, MARSH BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
DANIELS v. SANTOS et al
as 1:2022cv02364
Plaintiff:
TAMARA C. DANIELS
Defendant:
ROBERT L. SANTOS, MARILYN A. SANDERS, WILLIE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SCHMITZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
MARK SCHMITZ, SUZANNE SCHMITZ, DIANE FOLEY and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
