Cases 31 - 40 of 1,449
Jackson v. Huffman
as 4:2023cv04630
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Joan Huffman
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Adams v. Oliver et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams
Defendant:
Lori Oliver, Roy Bailey, Aaron Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Securus Tech, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Securus Tech, LLC, Roxanna LNU and FNU LNU 1:23-cv-211
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Collier et al
as 4:2023cv03950
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Oscar Mendoza, The TDCJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morariu v. Chapman et al
as 1:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE MORARIU
Defendant:
STEVE CHAPMAN, MATTHEW RABINOWITZ, ROY BAYNES and others
Nominal Defendant:
NATERA, INC.
Ussery v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv03844
Petitioner:
Roy Eugene Ussery
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kendricks v. USA Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Sheila Denise Kendricks
Defendant:
USA Department of Justice, State of Texas A.G.'s Office, Methodist Children's Home and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Balistreri-Amrhein v. Universal Insurance Company of North America et al
as 4:2023cv00901
Defendant:
American Technologies, Inc., Universal Insurance Company of North America, Chief Judge Brenda Rhoades and others
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Balistreri-Amrhein
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ussery v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00161
Petitioner:
Roy Eugene Ussery
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Amonet et al
as 2:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Roy Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Adrian Amonet, Assistant Warden P. Samaniego and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
