Cases 31 - 40 of 57
RUTHERFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv40129
Plaintiff:
NANCY A. RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RUTHERFORD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65661
Plaintiff:
JAMES CLIFFORD RUTHERFORD and JUDY M RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRAZIER et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63833
Plaintiff:
ELISHA RUTHERFORD FRAZIER and MAVIS BROWN
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00291
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 158
CABRERO v. DUKE et al
as 2:2011cv01303
Plaintiff:
ROSA CABRERO
Defendant:
CLAUDETTE WILLIAMS DUKE, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC., RUTHERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTHERFORD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60402
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., KEENE CORPORATION, NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUTHERFORD and RUBY RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUTHERFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv54179
Plaintiff:
CARL W. RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RUTHERFORD v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51333
Plaintiff:
RALPH W RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
RUTHERFORD, SR. v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80123
Plaintiff:
ROBERT RUTHERFORD, SR.
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOMER et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 2:2010cv01055
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOMER and HARRY J. RUTHERFORD
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
